100?! What is wrong with these people?
New North Sea oil and gas licences will send ‘wrecking ball’ through climate commitments
Submitted 1 year ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
Comments
guriinii@lemmy.world 1 year ago
ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m ok with this with the provision that these licences are ONLY issued to a UK nationalised energy company specifically set up to fund the green transition.
Since this is the conservative party, the chance of that is nill.
Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 1 year ago
How about we send actual wrecking balls through the oil rigs instead?
doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’d like to take the time to remind everyone we only have like 47 years of known oil reserves anyway.
jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 year ago
If we keep on at this rate, no one will want to live in the future of 47 years.
Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Oil will become prohibitively expensive at least a decade before reserves start running dry, so we’ll be driven to net zero before that anyway.
Cyber@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Considering that a LOT of gas in the UK came here by boat from the middle east, then, yes, this is actually a good thing.
Don’t get me wrong, we need to get to NetZero, but the plastic parts on your electric car are made from oil…
pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
Ah yes, how would they achieve net zero without fossil fuels??
jtb@feddit.uk 1 year ago
How do you make steel for wind turbines without fossil fuels? How do you build a nuclear power station without fossil fuels? How do you replace all the petrol and diesel cars in the country with electric ones, without using fossil fuels? Where is all the electricity going to come from? It’s complicated.
Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 year ago
As the other guy said: we can’t. We still need oil to set up the infrastructure needed for a net-zero future, which means we’re still forced to use oil for a while longer.
pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
That doesn’t mean we should give out new licenses