Submitted 4 months ago by bot@lemmy.smeargle.fans [bot] to hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/10/business/brands-avoid-term-customers/index.html
The term ‘AI’ is not not turning off customers. The actual product is turning off customers.
It has already been proven that the products claiming to be AI are just advanced enshitification and that they are inferior to traditional products.
It is time for everyone to jump off the AI bandwagon and start making products that are actually smart and aren’t just called “Smart”.
The study referenced measured buying intention for an identical product, in one instance described as having “AI”, and in the other as being “high tech”. So it is indeed the term AI.
High Tech doesn’t automatically mean MLL. There is still plenty of “High Tech” that isn’t a Techbros wet dream.
ravhall@discuss.online 4 months ago
I cringe every time I hear it. It’s not AI. It’s code. Or if you want to be fancy, call it an LLM if you must.
1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 4 months ago
The real problem is that AI is ill defined and the goal posts move to “wherever we are now plus a little more” and is always not quite there yet. Writing a simple script to take input of user on cli and performing some action on behalf of them is arguably “AI” in that it automates a task that a human would otherwise have to do themselves.
I think it’s probably a lot more useful to talk about a systems capabilities rather than its labels. Can this _ actually drive a car without human intervention? Can this _ actually write software without a coder looking over it and modifying the mistakes? For most domains, we aren’t there yet, where the thing is a human level (or better) autonomous agent.
But i guess it’s no surprise that an industry that exists primarily on hype clings to its stockholder-edging labels and marketing terms.
ravhall@discuss.online 4 months ago
Until i ask it a question and it complains about wage theft, im not gonna call it an AI.
Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
I mean, yes and no. Colloquially, there’s some confusion between AI and Strong AI. Strong AI is an AI that mimics human intelligence, whereas AI is an umbrella term for a lot of loosely related topics in comp sci. The way it’s often used currently where AI = LLMs/GANs lately is incorrect, but they both do fall under the field of AI.
It’s certainly a problem that some people think that AI = Strong AI = LLMs.
ravhall@discuss.online 4 months ago
I want herculean AI.