T. rex

Comments

• Contramuffin@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m going to need context here

  source

  • randomsnark@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I came to the comments looking for context, but since nobody has sold it yet, did some googling. I believe this is the reference: news.sky.com/…/tyrannosaurus-rex-could-have-been-…

    source

    • saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      may have weighed roughly 15 tonnes instead of 8.8, and measured 15 metres instead of 12.

      I find that very hard to believe for a bipedal land animal. Hit age 3 and your knees and hips are just done.

      source
  • Lommy241@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Glad to see I wasn’t the only one who couldn’t understand this. Was worried I had a stroke.

    source
  • refalo@programming.dev ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Maybe they’re saying we don’t really know how big or small they got.

    source
• breadsmasher@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Does this mean that due to undersampling, we can only assume we have found the biggest fossils/skeletons/remains, and cannot know how big they could really get?

  source

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I think it’s the opposite. They’re saying that physical limitations on size exist (bone strength, lung capacity) even if you only found one skeleton. So significantly bigger TRexs aren’t possible.

    source

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Not according to this post lemmy.ml/comment/12594857

      source

      • -> View More Comments