Pretty much all dating apps are owned by Match. If that monopoly is broken, it’ll be good for everyone.
Commenting to remind myself to come back to this later.
Submitted 1 week ago by lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world to videos@lemmy.world
Pretty much all dating apps are owned by Match. If that monopoly is broken, it’ll be good for everyone.
Commenting to remind myself to come back to this later.
deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Fewer* people. If you can count it, it’s fewer. If not, it’s less, e.g. less money, fewer dollars.
foiledAgain@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Thanks Stannis
my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 1 week ago
Language is defined by how it’s used, if it’s common for people to say “less” then that is correct. Trying to define the only “correct” usage counter to how people actually use the language is prescriptivism, which rarely changes how people actually speak. The only real use of prescriptivism is elitism.
You clearly understood what was said, you just wanted to announce you’re “better” at English.
elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I would normally agree with you.
But just as it’s okay for people to speak the way they want, it’s also okay for people to spread language knowledge. Then let the people decide whether they want to use that knowledge or not.
It’s not like OP said “it’s ‘fewer’, you idiot!” In that case, I’d say it’s elitism. Otherwise, it’s just a useful lemmy comment.
themaninblack@lemmy.world 1 week ago
yu dont even not understand how to not speak good yerself
atro_city@fedia.io 1 week ago
What the equivalent opposite of fewer?
artichokecustard@lemmy.world 1 week ago
manyer
elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 week ago
More.