Submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/ccc73deb-148d-42b6-b7c1-ac389984b6ab.jpeg
So someone listened to at least 34h of porn-audio online for a paper?
That’sa a clever way to get porn access at work.
Tbf, a proper participant based study would have been much more innovative and provide better evidence.
Even when only using 30 cases.
Ah, evolutionary psychology. The realm of making shit up and somehow getting to be a professor for doing so.
1950 female, 289 male
Original full text: www.sciencedirect.com/…/S1090513824000217#:~:text….
Worx@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
I love that their source is just porn… Sorry, “authentic sexual experiences shared online”
merari42@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Wouldn’t porn have a clear bias due to selection issues, if fake moaning is more common in porn than in real live? Then again gathering experimental data would have an experimenter demand issue. Just imagine you are a participant in the natural human sex sounds study. Hard to imagine that you do not take that consciously into account.
Worx@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
I would have thought that it’s not a great source, but also I’ve only read half the abstract of this paper so who am I to say?
DancingBear@midwest.social 1 year ago
I’m going to have to check their sources to see if they are credible.