OPINION: Despite all the doom and gloom about physical media in recent months, it continues to walk – perhaps a little unsteady, but it’s still one foot in front of the other.
…
4K Blu-ray has been in existence for about eight years, and after tentative launches of new films – it took Disney more than a year to launch its first 4K Blu-ray title in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.2 – there’s been an increasing amount of new films and catalogue (older titles) hitting the market.
jNot all the titles I’d like to be on 4K Blu-ray are making it to the format. It would have been nice to see a 4K physical version of Greta Lee’s Past Lives, but I can see the logic of a small film not being the biggest seller in the market. That Poor Things and The Iron Claw are new releases that aren’t getting a 4K release (at least for the time being) is disappointing, considering I think those two films would benefit from the boost in resolution and colour performance.
But what I find more frustrating is that, like vinyl, there is an increasingly big push towards 4K Blu-ray becoming a collectors market. As I write this Dune: Part Two has hit the cinemas, the home cinema releases have been announced and the film is getting a limited edition steelbook release on HMV, and the email I received on March 1st already had the words “limited copies available”
In the ‘olden’ days, you’d have expected this type of release a couple years after the film had been available, as a way of making people double dip. Instead, steelbooks are being used to push the price up while – aside from the visual design – there’s nothing particularly special about steelbooks themselves. And even more annoyingly, studios are now packaging the Blu-ray along with the 4K Blu-ray, but only with the steelbooks, so if you want a HD copy for your library then you’ll have to pay more.
There are still some standouts, like Oppenheimer. If Godzilla Minus One has a 4k release with both color and B&W, that’s a preorder for me. Planet Earth III is also great.
Emperor@feddit.uk 8 months ago
It feels like a bit of a strawman as the fancy editions are usually followed by a standard one, the former just helps the releaser recoup some of their costs.
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 8 months ago
I honestly can’t blame them for trying. And in a way…Maybe it’s a little less rubbish than being forced to double-dip because the collector’s edition came out later.
The price I object to is the cost of a player that is both quiet, and compatible with the newer UHD formats. It feels like unless you spend over £400, they don’t even think about the noise.