That’s the point of the regulations. Directly banning porn sites would be unconstitutional, but there’s a loophole.
Comment on Pornhub Is Now Blocked In Almost All of the U.S. South
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 month agoAh, thx. I was under the impression that these porn sites get blocked... But it's the other way around, the porn sites block the users because they don't/cant't implement the regulations.... Thx for explaining.
i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 month ago
Kind of how they went after marijuana in order to target Black people.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 month ago
The regulations are essentially “you need to take the ID of everyone who uses your site and hand it over to the government to protect the children”. Privacy be damned, and I guarantee it’s going to become more and more widespread.
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 month ago
I own some eID and it's supposed to do age verification for like a decade now. And they must have hired some proper computer science experts, because the idea was to impement this as a zero knowledge proof. You can proof your age to a porn site completely anonymously, without revealing anything (not even your age), just that you're above a certain age.
Of course no onr uses that system 😑
ego@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Just like accessing direct messages or any other form of personal data, it’s never actually about the children.
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 month ago
Sadly true. And happens we've just started discussing total internet surveillence again in Germany. I'm not sure if that's any better. For some reason they're always pushing for data retention / surveillance / snooping on private messages here.