Comment on Diamond market

• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Yes, but a clear crystal is a clear crystal.

  If you want to split light you can do what regardless of refractive index (as long as it isn’t zero), you’d just need to cut different angles and/or project the light onto a surface that’s closer/farther to get the same effect using a different material.

  source

  • UID_Zero@infosec.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Yes, but a clear crystal is a clear crystal.

    No, different materials have different refractive indices, even if they’re both “clear crystals.” Maybe the examples given are very close in refractive index, but they still differ, therefore split light differently. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_refractive_indices

    I’m not saying it’s the entire difference, but it certainly comes into play. It could be that the more “explosive” light example is cut identically, but held slightly askew versus the others.

    Point is, it’s not just the cut that impacts the result.

    source

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      …

      That’s literally my point.

      I’m saying you can’t tell the difference between two materials unless they are cut the same.

      If they are cut differently to achieve the results you are seeing, you can’t tell whether the difference is because of the cut, or because of the material.

      source

      • UID_Zero@infosec.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        That makes sense. It wasn’t coming across in the earlier comments.

        source