are you an artist? are you working on, or with, ai? are you a lawyer?
where does this comment come from and why do you feel the need to add this comment under a prompt based image?
Comment on Speed Pioneer
BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 weeks ago
Why does an image generated from an AI trained on other people’s stolen copyrighted work, in itself copyrighted?
merde@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 weeks ago
Read the full generation parameters you don’t.
masterpiece, hyper realism, a high-resolution photograph, golden ratio, dutch angle, dynamic, side view, Rocket Red`
Steps: 33, Sampler: euler_beta, Seed: 94364613076775, VAE: ae.safetensors, Model: flux_dev.safetensors, **_Copyright: © 2024 NiOut_**, Model hash: 4610115bb0, Lora_0 Model hash: 379e73dccf, Lora_0 Model name: flux_realism_lora.safetensors, Lora_0 Strength clip: 1, Lora_0 Strength model: 1d00ery@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It might be related to the code and not the output.
BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 weeks ago
Since it doesn’t mention either, you have to assume it’s intended for both.
merde@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
the prompt has nothing to do with my question. I am questioning your comment.
with the way things are, there surely will come a day when people can copyright their prompts. Why do YOU care, you fucking dolt.
BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 weeks ago
Apologies, I will address the first comments questions: no, yes, no, because the generating prompt has a copyright for no reason I can discern and should be omitted and looks unnecessarily/impotently litigious.
You cannot copyright a fucking prompt, but you could sure as fuck try, but it will fail because that shit would not hold in any court of law otherwise companies could copyright: a fucking cooking recipe, a fucking figure of speech, a fucking vulgar word, a fucking random sequence of words, your dad’s name during his weekly peggings from your beautiful mother, etc.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
what was stolen? !
BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 weeks ago
Sounds like you don’t know… So here you go:
forbes.com/…/is-generative-ai-stealing-from-artis…
newyorker.com/…/is-ai-art-stealing-from-artists
smithsonianmag.com/…/lists-artists-artificial-int…
nbcnews.com/…/visual-artists-fight-back-ai-compan…
www.bbc.com/news/technology-62788725
forbes.com/…/ai-generated-art-was-a-mistake-and-h…
news.harvard.edu/…/is-art-generated-by-artificial…
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
copying isn’t stealing, which seems to be the premise of these pieces, but AI doesn’t copy, anyway. it uses a predictive model to approximate responses.