Comment on [deleted]

AresUII@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• logos@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  If it’s even an argument and not a simple refutation, I think it’s got to be based on personal anecdote, but it also kinda just sounds like “No, you’re wrong.” with a sprinkle of anecdote or no true Scotsman.

  Argument from asininity?

  source
• someguy3@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Anecdata.

  source

  • Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Unless it’s stupid, then it’s anecdodo.

    source
• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  This is the answer

  source

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    it’s a fucking stupid answer. that’s not the what anecdotal evidence means at all

    source

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      What does anecdotal evidence mean then?

      source

      • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        It’s just a broad umbrella concept in formal logic. what makes you think this interaction is best described by logic and not psychological or social dynamics? it’s not like the fuckin dude is publishing a research paper. op has someone busting their aglets and wants to find words to describe the experience. what makes you think their chief complaint is the same concept that can describe the statement “all cats are black”

        source

        • -> View More Comments