My point is, you donât get away with killing someone just because you used a car to do so, and I think that proves my point.
Feel free to come up with some evidence of your own.
Comment on Relevant advertising đ€Ș
optissima@lemmy.ml âš4â© âšdaysâ© agoYour example is weak because they did a hate crime, which this would not have been. Do you have a better one?
My point is, you donât get away with killing someone just because you used a car to do so, and I think that proves my point.
Feel free to come up with some evidence of your own.
Getting away is not the point, the point is a lighter sentence.
the point is a lighter sentence
Didnât work for the example above, did it?
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world âš4â© âšdaysâ© ago
Well, technically this seems to have been a hate crime as well - just not of a âprotected classâ (which Iâm sure is a âshortcomingâ of the law that theyâll get âaddressedâ).
optissima@lemmy.ml âš4â© âšdaysâ© ago
Technically, hate crimes consist of crime because of innate properties of an individual (+religion), which again this isnât. No doubt theyâll codify something special for the rich soon, but still not a hate crime.
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world âš4â© âšdaysâ© ago
Itâs that religion exception that belies the idea that itâs solely about qualities of a person that they have no control over. Beliefs are beliefs, regardless if theyâre related to religion or capitalism.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works âš4â© âšdaysâ© ago
âCapitalistâ isnât a protected class, and I donât think that hate crime legislation is very strong in the US in any case.