Then blame the monsters who ignore human rights for sake of profit, and their enablers. Not the person who saved lives by giving the billionaires a reality check. Yes, it was an unlawful killing. But if the law protects mass murder by denial of life saving care, then how should people change something?
Comment on It's true
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 week agoAm I a bootlicker simply because I don’t agree with a killing?
I’m not in any way saying the CEO was not a total shitbag who was the effective cause of many deaths.
I just don’t like that murder was seemingly what needed to happen to give people a voice.
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 week ago
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I do blame the monstrous predators of our fucked up healthcare system that ruin and end people’s lives to make a profit.
I also don’t like that someone had to be killed in response.
I don’t blame the guy, but I also believe that killing is wrong.
fosho@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
it is unfortunate that someone had to be killed. the argument is that there is no other way to accomplish change. and I would probably agree with that.
Manzas@lemdro.id 1 week ago
It appears you need to go and fsck yourself
Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 1 week ago
[deleted]gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Why does not wanting people killed mean I’m a centrist?
Josey_Wales@lemmy.world 1 week ago
[deleted]krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Well, can you explain why you don’t agree with the killing? He was killed, yes, but you haven’t explained why that’s a bad thing.
Adori@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Unfortunately yes, peaceful protest isn’t working nowadays
frostysauce@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Never has.