You’re using the legal definition, and there is no legal justification for what he did. I do believe there’s a moral one, though. Also I was unaware that the taking of a life with justification in the law is not considered murder.
Comment on It's true
Josey_Wales@lemmy.world 1 week ago[Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed with the necessary intention as defined by the law in a specific jurisdiction.
NYS Penal Law SECTION 35.15 Justification; use of physical force in defense of a person
Whether or not he is a murderer depends on whether the DA can meet their burden of proving he committed the acts necessary to satisfy the elements of NYS definition of whatever degree of murder the Grand Jury indicts (if that happens) AND he is not able to establish the affirmative defense of justification.
None of these determinations have been made yet.
I gotta ask, are you a time traveler or a boot licker?
krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Josey_Wales@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Whether there is a legal justification depends on a jury. Sorry you don’t like it but it’s how the law works. I suggest you try to learn about the things you have opinions on.
krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Corporate greed is not justification. I doubt you believe that the US of all places would rule out in favour of a CEO killer.
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Am I a bootlicker simply because I don’t agree with a killing?
I’m not in any way saying the CEO was not a total shitbag who was the effective cause of many deaths.
I just don’t like that murder was seemingly what needed to happen to give people a voice.
Adori@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Unfortunately yes, peaceful protest isn’t working nowadays
frostysauce@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Never has.
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Then blame the monsters who ignore human rights for sake of profit, and their enablers. Not the person who saved lives by giving the billionaires a reality check. Yes, it was an unlawful killing. But if the law protects mass murder by denial of life saving care, then how should people change something?
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I do blame the monstrous predators of our fucked up healthcare system that ruin and end people’s lives to make a profit.
I also don’t like that someone had to be killed in response.
I don’t blame the guy, but I also believe that killing is wrong.
fosho@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
it is unfortunate that someone had to be killed. the argument is that there is no other way to accomplish change. and I would probably agree with that.
Manzas@lemdro.id 1 week ago
It appears you need to go and fsck yourself
Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 1 week ago
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Why does not wanting people killed mean I’m a centrist?
Josey_Wales@lemmy.world 1 week ago
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Josey_Wales@lemmy.world 1 week ago
krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Well, can you explain why you don’t agree with the killing? He was killed, yes, but you haven’t explained why that’s a bad thing.