I liked that the writer stuck with clear and simple english instead of flowering up his prose, but I just feel that using borrowed quips and popart philosophy isn’t an honest way to write. It feels more in line with a teen or a young adult trying to find their voice in the words of others (and we’ve all been there)
Comment on Anon reads the news
Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 months agoYou’d be disappointed if he isn’t also a genius writer?
tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 months ago
I still feel being “disappointed” is harsh. He’s 26 and just wanted his thoughts out. He may have been trying, maybe even subconsciously, to emulate some literary devices more or less successfully in an effort to better convey his feelings but I really don’t think the point was to write great literature.
tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
To theirs credit, the part about watching their mother suffer was very relatable and felt extremely honest. I guess I was hoping that they would open with something like that instead of talking about their philosophy first. You’re right though, the writer is likely young and I shouldn’t expect so much.
aislopmukbang@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 months ago
I don’t see the issue in quoting works of fiction if you think they express something you’re trying to say. People quote Shakespeare all the time to make a point but nobody cares because that’s old and accepted. No I’m not saying Gladiator is on a level with Shakespeare but there’s a weird imbalance in what you’re allowed to quote in your argument and what not. If the imagery spoke to him, why not?
iii@mander.xyz 10 months ago
Otherwise the whole of marxism would be off limits
frostysauce@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Did… Did you just gatekeep anger?