Comment on Mitochondria

• Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Err, but each of my comments have been directly addressing things that you’ve stated in this thread, so wouldn’t that logically infer that my comments are related to this thread? Explicitly my logic would be: If comment A directly addresses the content in comment comment B, then A is related to B; each of my comments respectively address the content in each of your comments; therefore, my comments are related to your comments ^[1]^. Would you mind outlining exactly isn’t related to the thread? Perhaps I missed something.

  References

  1. “Modus Ponens”. Wikipedia. Published: 2024-07-07T05:04Z. Accessed: 2024-12-11T02:36Z. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_ponens. - §“Explanation”. ¶1. > 1. If P, then Q. > 2. P. > 3. Therefore, Q.

  source

  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Being tangential to the overall topic doesn’t mean you’re addressing the actual main point of this thread

    source

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I think it’s important to define exactly how “this thead” is being used in this context. When I use “this thread”, it’s to refer to our exchange of comments; it doesn’t refer to all comments under OP’s post. I’m not sure if there’s an official definition for the term — perhaps I am not using the term in a commonly understood way.

      source