Comment on Watch: Billionaire CEO says unemployment 'has to jump' to put 'arrogant' workers in their place
hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 months agoI think he means 40 to 50% higher than now. It’s historically quite low at the moment.
Comment on Watch: Billionaire CEO says unemployment 'has to jump' to put 'arrogant' workers in their place
hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 months agoI think he means 40 to 50% higher than now. It’s historically quite low at the moment.
squiblet@kbin.social 9 months ago
It is low now, but also (in the US) the last few administrations played games with how they defined it, mainly by excluding people who had basically given up on finding employment.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 9 months ago
That’s nothing new. That’s how it’s always been defined. I’m not unemployed if I’m not looking for work. Otherwise housewives would be unemployed, disabled people, pensioners, etc.
The one weird part is people transitioning just are counted towards the unemployed numbers even though they have a job coming.
squiblet@kbin.social 9 months ago
They expanded the definition 5-10 years ago at various times, which resulted in a lower reported rate.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 9 months ago
You have a cite for that?
According to this it hasn’t changed since 1945 when it was defined.
pewresearch.org/…/employment-vs-unemployment-diff….