Comment on TURKEY POWER
toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks agoThe source for that number is the International Atomic Energy Agency aka the nuclear fusion control agency. As for the rest of your ideas, its sadly not that easy. It has to be stored somewhere where it cant contaminate the environment, water cant get to it, tectonics are stable, etc. No permanent storage location for the waste has been found, to date.
And to burn the unburned fuel you would have to breed the material, which is a process that requires the most dangerous reactors and is extremely costly.
Morphit@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Onkalo
France reprocesses spent fuel. With increased scale it would be cheaper and cut down on the volume of waste that must be dealt with regardless of if there’s a nuclear industry in the future.
Maalus@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Also “spent” fuel is like 90% recyclable.
toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
ah thats cool. I didnt know there finally was a permanent storage facility.
As far as I know france stopped the breeder program?
Morphit@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
The Phénix rector shut down in 2009 so I think that was the end of France’s breeder reactors. India, China and Russia have operating breeder reactors.
Breeding from non-fissile material is different to reprocessing though. Reprocessing is a chemical process, not a nuclear one. The UK had an operational reprocessing capability - though it is being decommissioned now because it wasn’t cost effective with such a small fleet. Japan is still trying to bring its reprocessing plant online (after years of trouble). However France is doing it routinely for their domestic fleet and some foreign reactors IIRC. The USA made reprocessing illegal back in 1977 due to proliferation concerns. Despite that ban being repealed, they haven’t set up the regulatory infrastructure to be able to do it so no one has bothered. Maybe the new nuclear industry will shake that up a bit.