Comment on What are the connotations of Joe Rogan?

• Rooki@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It gets in the Rule 5 area. Already removed enough comments.

  source

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Users kept calling people bigots without evidence, but you’ve only removed the comments requesting evidence of bigotry rather than the unsupported original insults.

    That reaction is not in accordance with the posted rules of NSQ.

    source

    • Rooki@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Its against the rules that i didnt banned you both. The first one is personal opinion. The rest was just insulting. And not relevant to the post.

      source

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Thanks for responding, by the way

        The first comments by the other party are unsubstantiated accusations, I agree, although my first reply is a direct contradiction providing evidence from within the podcast they mentioned.

        After that, the person called me a bigot and gaslighting, words they are using incorrectly and have no evidence for, which I pointed out.

        I understand if you are basing this decision on your personal opinion of rogan, but this person is just name-calling without evidence, baiting comments(against NSQ posted rules) and I’m providing contradicting evidence to their incorrect and unsupported name-calling.

        source