Comment

Comment on Starfield, is it getting review bombed?

totallymojo@ttrpg.network ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

To me it was a disaster because I expected it to be way more next gen after all these years. And it was very expensive compared to the quality I got.
Meanwhile my friend was all like “Eh, it’s fine. Pretty much what I expected.”
So I think people had very different expectations.

What I absolutely cannot comprehend is those who say “10/10, game of the century!”
Come on… No way. If you really think that, you have really low standards or haven’t played a new game in 8 years.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Carighan@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I expected it to be way more next gen after all these years

It is “next generation”:

It’s the next generation of huge.

It’s also the next generation of empty.

It’s the next generation of pretty.

It’s also the next generation of soulless.

I mean, it basically heightens all previous design parameters for open world games, does it not?
source
- qarbone@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  It is absolutely NOT the next generation of “pretty”. Can’t even sign up for the qualifiers for that competition.
  
  source