Most are safer than nuclear, but until the environmental cost of manufacturing them is outweighed by the benefit of their use then nuclear is the least intolerable stopgap.
Comment on Anon questions our energy sector
areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 months agoA hydro damn breaking has killed more people than Chernobyl before, and probably will again. Renewables are not perfect either unfortunately. Though some are slightly safer than nuclear.
OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Wait are you saying that renewables have too much environmental cost to make?
OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Some do. Hydro is a net positive, not sure about wind but probably, but last I heard solar not so much. That may have changed since.
areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 months ago
I know manufacturing panels and batteries have a significant environmental cost. Being a net negative though I am not sure about. Could you link some sources?
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Nobody wants dams. It’s ecocide.
areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Since when? There are dams all over the place.