Comment

Comment on Anon tries programming in Java

I strongly prefer how interfaces are handled

It’s better than Java, but they still chose to walk headfirst into the same trap that bites Java developers in the ass: placing the implementations under the concrete type instead of the interface.

When you have two interfaces that each require you to implement a function with the same name but a different signature, you’re in for a bad time featuring an abomination of wrapper types.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Willem@kutsuya.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
On that last note, can’t you use the explicit interface implementation in C#?

e.g.

public class SampleClass : IControl, ISurface { void IControl.Paint() { System.Console.WriteLine("IControl.Paint"); } void ISurface.Paint() { System.Console.WriteLine("ISurface.Paint"); } }
source
- pivot_root@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I haven’t kept up with recent Java developments, but with Go, you’re out of luck. Interface implementations are—for both better and worse—completely implicit.
  
  source
  - Amir@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    He mentioned C#, which does let you explicitly choose to implement same-name functions of two interfaces with different code
    
    source
    pivot_root@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    For some reason, my brain inserted a “like” before “C#”, and answered the question of “can’t you use explicit interfaces like C#.”
    
    source
TunaCowboy@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

just one more oop bro I swear

Pure oopium. All oop ‘design patterns’ exist solely to overcome the inherent flaws of oop.

source
- pivot_root@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Maybe check before putting words in my mouth, m’kay?
  
  Sincerely, someone who uses composition.
  
  source