An assassination isn’t “an official act”, plain and simple. The Supreme Court ruled on one specific case. They allowed it then. A different case could be ruled illegal. Which it would 100% be done, be it a republican court, a democratic court, or some magical unbiased one from fairy land.
Comment on US Democracy
Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 month agoSupreme court said it was if it’s an official act
Maalus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
GiveMemes@jlai.lu 1 month ago
That isn’t how the Supreme Court works. An insurrection isn’t an ‘official act’ either btw but here we are. I recommend you look into court precedent.
ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Yeah, but who decides what’s an official act? I think that ruling was only ever meant to benefit republicans
Maalus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The Supreme Court does, he just said that
HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Exactly. This makes the entire thing a joke.
The court will decide acts are official when convenient (read: supports their guy).
The Federalist Society needs to be outlawed as a terrorist organization.
IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Add the Heritage Society and most social media to that list