It won’t cause the perception to differ because the difference is so small it’s impossible to measure
Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g
NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So obviously I ended up in the middle of this bell curve. How would that cause the perception of the ball’s acceleration to differ?
trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Edge004@lemm.ee 1 month ago
The middle of the bell curve only works in a vacuum, and the top of the bell curve is true with wind resistance
BB84@mander.xyz 1 month ago
Even in a perfect vacuum the bowling ball still falls faster. See my comment sibling to yours.
Edge004@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Oh, interesting. That’s a cool fact
BB84@mander.xyz 1 month ago
When the earth pulls on an object with some F newtons of force, the object is also pulling on the earth with the same force. It’s just that the earth is so massive that its acceleration F/m will be tiny. Tiny is not zero though, so the earth is still accelerating toward the object. The heavier the object, the faster earth accelerates toward it.
Both the bowling ball and the feather accelerates toward earth at the same g=9.81m/s^2, but the earth accelerates toward the bowling ball faster than it does toward the feather.
rooroo@feddit.org 1 month ago
But the question is which one falls faster, not which one pulls the earth faster.
Middle it is!
Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Both accelerate at the same speed, but the bowling ball completes it’s fall first because the Earth was pulled up to meet it. The bowling ball falls faster not because it’s moving faster, but because it’s fall is shorter.
rooroo@feddit.org 1 month ago
Unless they’re being let go at the same time at the same place, so the pull difference makes the minuscule difference even more minuscule.