Comment on How a small but vocal minority of social media users distort reality and sow division
freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 month agoNo anonymous posting means what? Credit card verified accounts? Mobile number verified accounts? On all websites or just ones that meet a threshold like Facebook and Twitter?
What happens to sites hosted outside the US like the lemmy instance you use? Are they blocked? Does the US try to prosecute them and get them extradited like they do with pirate sites?
Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
For larger website that allow political discussions and reach a lot of people, yes I think verification would help tackle disinformation. Same thing that happens to websites that don’t follow GDPR is what I would imagine.
If you have suggestions for dealing with foreign disinformation, I’m all ears
freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
GDPR violations result in fines. It also applies to entities engaged in commercial activities.
You are foreign to me and in fact a lot of misinformation and propaganda comes from the US. I would not block access to US media.
You still haven’t answered what would to the Lemmy instances you currently use and allow anonymous (email as verification is not very hard) posting.
Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I agree that a lot of disinformation comes from snd is aimed at the US.
For Lemmy, idk. On one hand, it could also be restricted. I can imagine restrictions being dependent on the size of the website in terms of traffic and posting.
On the other, if there isn’t such a huge impact because of it’s size, then restrictions aren’t necessary.