Comment on Nobel Prize 2024
Godort@lemm.ee 6 days ago
To be fair, the protein folding thing is legitimately impressive and an actual good use for the technology that isnt just harvesting people’s creativity for profit.
the technology that isnt just harvesting people’s creativity for profit.
It’s the system harvesting people’s creativity for profit. Capitalism did it, capitalism does that, capitalism will always do that. In best case. Otherwise it will harvest people entirely.
omg what is even the point of scientific progress and the advancement of human knowledge unless one specific person gets all the glory. What is science even for if not the validation of some human’s individual ego.
What is science even for if not the validation of some human’s individual ego.
Satisfaction of personal curiosity with goverment funding
I mean, what are most of us doing ever at all for all of history if not validating our individual egos in one way or another?
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 6 days ago
The way to tell so often seems to be if someone has called it AI or Machine Learning.
AI? “I put this through chatgpt” (or “The media department has us by the balls”)
ML? “I crunched a huge amount of data in a huge amount of ways, and found something interesting”
keepthepace@slrpnk.net 6 days ago
Actually I endorse the fact that we are less shy of calling “AI” algorithms that do exhibit emergent intelligence and broad knowledge. AI uses to be a legitimate name for the field that encompasses ML and we do understood a lot of interesting things about intelligence thanks to LLMs nowadays, like the fact that training on next-word-prediction is enough to create pretty complex world models, that transformer architectures are capable of abstraction or that morality arise naturally when you try to acquire all the pre-requisites to have a normal discussion with a human.
Graphy@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Yeah my class in college was just called Artificial Intelligence