Comment on Why are people impressed with SpaceX?

• neveraskedforthis@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  The(y) didn’t pioneer reusable rockets

  They did pioneer reusable orbital liquid fueled rockets, closest before that was the space shuttle’s SRBs (solid fuel, dumped and fished out the ocean).

  and they’re not cheap either. They’re expensive,

  They are incredibly cheap to operate by rocket standards, the reason why they haven’t lowered the pricetag is:

  a. Would absolutely be an anti-trust against them if they didn’t stay close to competitors (monopoly by simply being too good is a thing)

  b. Capitalism baby, they have no real competitor so they can make a crazy profit (and because of point A they basically have to unless they want to be sued to oblivion).

  and they’re floating on government grants

  Contracts* They have government contracts. Government requests a service, SpaceX provides the service, SpaceX gets paid, simple as that. They have gotten subsidies to expand Starlink, but every ISP gets that and even then they have been declined it countless times because AT&T, etc. have lobbied against them.

  SpaceX s(ti)ll hasn’t done anything hat wasn’t done better long before.

  I’m sorry, what other rockets and space capsules can be reused? What other rocket can be returned directly on the launch pad?

  They do party hard (wh)en a rocket of theirs explodes, which I never saw NASA do.

  Because they see milestones being completed in the testing program, it’s about where it exploded (it was gonna explode either way, planned or unplanned).

  They managed to get their super duper new heavy rocket in an uncontrolled spin in low earth orbit! I’m sorry, Noy impressed by results that are less than half of what -again- NASA did in the 60’ and 80’ of the last century.

  NASA sent a 50m tall, 9m wide second stage that was designed to be fully reusable with full-flow staged engines and then transferred super-chilled fuel between tanks? Cool! Which system was that? Would love to read about it!

  source
• baseless_discourse@mander.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  This is a very interesting argument. Like many people, I am not familiar with rocket building. Do you mind providing some sources so we can judge for ourselves?

  Thanks in advance!

  source

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It’s not like they hide and launch. As much as I would like to not have Musk as the CEO, the company itself is great despite Musk, so overall a win. Musk is just the idiot they need at the top. Others might be too risk adverse and just create NASA 2.0. We all know NASA sucks at flying anything.

    In my opinion Space X is a great company and its engineers, just like Tesla, is what keeps them innovative rather than the racist idiot riding on their shoulders… example Boeing. The engineers made great planes, the business assholes made great money. So if we can keep the idiot at the top making risky crazy promises and funneling money into the company, then the engineers will have great ideas to demonstrate and all the technicians and office workers and cleaning crew, all of them will have a job. Putting money into Tesla is basically pumping the economy. The results is currently a constellation of temporary Internet satellites. That’s at least something.

    source
• AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  You might check your research a bit, go beyond Facebook GeForce your “facts”

  source