Comment on Ackchuallly
Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 1 month ago
Three whole hours and the descriptivists haven’t come by to tell us there are no rules to language. This might be a record.
Comment on Ackchuallly
Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 1 month ago
Three whole hours and the descriptivists haven’t come by to tell us there are no rules to language. This might be a record.
my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 1 month ago
There definitely are rules to language, which are determined by how the language is actually used. The issue with prescriptivists is that they invent their own rules which often go against how the language is used, i.e. the rules are nonsense.
Take the “less vs fewer” argument. Everyone happily uses ‘less’ in pretty much the same way for nearly a millennium, then some prescriptivist asswipe comes along and says they don’t like it so now there’s a rule. Prescriptivists spend the next couple of centuries yelling about their new rule and creaming themselves over how they’re now ‘better’ at the language than other people while everyone else just doesn’t give a fuck and continue to speak normally.
In the end language is just a tool to communicate ideas. If you clearly understood someone but whine because they ignored your made up rules you’re the asshole.
Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 1 month ago
Twelve hours, folks.
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 month ago
I thought it would be fewer
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
i’d say the bigger issue with prescriptivists is that they don’t think the rules of language are allowed to change, nor are you allowed to violate the rules.
Everyone must speak exactly the same language, dialects are verboten and so is change.