Comment on Any advice for generating reproducible images across devices?

tal@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• comfy@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I haven’t determined that. I only have one device set up to run SD and haven’t organized any test with someone else.

  I mean, if the concern is that tiling is a factor relative to non-tiling, okay, but if someone else is tiling, l’d think that they’d get the same output.

  That’s true, I’ll check to see if the metadata mentions the tiling was used.

  source

  • tal@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    If you’re talking about that VAE tiling feature or whatever it’s called, I think that it shows up in the text below the image in A1111, and I think that anything that shows up there is also stored in the generated image’s comment metadata.

    I don’t normally use Tiled Diffusion, if that’s what you’re referring to, but let me see if I can go generate something with it and check.

    checks

    Yeah, text: Tiled Diffusion: {“Method”: “MultiDiffusion”, “Tile tile width”: 96, “Tile tile height”: 96, “Tile Overlap”: 48, “Tile batch size”: 4}, gets added.

    That being said, I don’t know how far I’d trust the image metadata for reproducibility if this is a hard requirement you’re looking for. I have definitely seen various settings that mention that they induce non-deterministic behavior, and I’m not sure that all of those are encoded in the metadata. Also, while the version (and looks like git hash of built version) is encoded, I’m sure that not everyone is using the same version, and I don’t know what compatibility is like across versions.

    source