That’s not what was said. What was said was anybody using it in any capacity for any job should be fired.
Which is obviously a very, very stupid take.
Comment on Fears for patient safety as GPs use ChatGPT to diagnose and treat illness
Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 4 weeks agoThere’s a difference between using LLMs to edit text, provide ideas or give you information that you can double check because you have the subject matter experience. Relying on it as a substitute for skill when something important is at stake like someone’s well being is reckless at best.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
Yep I agree. Also I love your user name.
YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
Sure, but the original quote was:
There’s no nuance there it’s just AI = bad. I agree that it’s shouldn’t, in its current form, be used as a substitute for skill in important situations. You’re totally right there.
DonPiano@feddit.org 4 weeks ago
I never said AI = bad. AI is much broader and contains worthwhile and non-plagiarized approaches.
If it’s worth doing, do it properly.
echodot@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
No you did say that.
You said anyone using an AI in any capacity should be fired. I have heard infinitely better takes from 4-year-olds and why they need more ice cream.
DonPiano@feddit.org 4 weeks ago
This is on a post about chatgpt use. Chatgpt is from the set of llms, which is a subset of ai.
Ai is cool. The current batch of LLMs/PISS can leave.