Comment on He must be stopped!

• ameancow@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  containing loli

  It wasn’t containing loli, it had generic hentai and some horse stuff. I was there and saw it, about 1000 hate-watchers immediately screamed “LOLI” and it stuck.

  I think to be fair the artist was a known artist who had done loli, but people don’t necessarily save porn based on what other works the artist has made. It was pretty desperate, people REALLY need to hate people who have different opinions.

  source

  • Veneroso@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This.

    That content is not my cup of tea, but at least it’s not real kids. Even if the “characters” are 18 to 1000 years old…

    source
• trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  ITT we have VDS

  It was like one picture of drawn porn with a character that is canonically underage but didn’t look underage in the picture.

  source
• hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’m always torn about this.

  If you have those thoughts and act on it, it’s a crime and it’s awful. But if you don’t, why should we penalize you? Shouldn’t we encourage people with those thoughts not to act on it?

  It’s a really dark topic, but I really wish we could properly discuss it. And if we consider how many people seem to have those thoughts, we should find a better way than to hunt them. Because to them it’s just a “damned if you do, danned if you don’t” and that’s probably gonna encourage more crimes.

  Unfortunately considering how bipartisan all conversations are and how hard it is to discuss those topics, it’s gonna be awhile until we can really take a shot at improving our processes when it comes to that.

  source

  • degen@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Legality aside, insofar as it is philosophically debatable, gross and pedophilic is still gross and pedophilic.

    If you know someone is thinking about murdering people around them, but holds off, would that make you feel any safer? I think the focus should be helping people not want that rather than appeasement.

    source

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yes it would. If I knew someone is thinking about murder and someone else is doing the murder, and I could choose, I would definitely take the one thinking about murder.

      Now it would be great if no one was thinking about murder in the first place but the world is complex, and because we are able to choose to some degree, let’s do that instead of saying “IDC both is bad to the same degree”.

      source

      • degen@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I agree nobody should be imprisoned for having thoughts. I also don’t think accepting something like loli as an outlet is helpful. Emulation of problematic tendencies isn’t exactly therapeutic.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Veneroso@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Anti abortion but pro school shootings. That’s another one of those hipocracy positions.

      source
• AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Yeah, that’s his remaining audience in a nutshell. It’s legit creepy.

  source