Comment on Trump advisor LOSES HIS MIND when confronted by foreign journalist

<- View Parent
Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

(although, obviously he is but I can’t be bothered to dredge up all that BS)

I clearly agree with you. The point is that his argument “Kamala is abusing her mixed heritage to pander to those audiences” is the best way to interpret the argument to come to rational conclusions.

In my counter-argument I simply state the premises: The candidates job is to win (implied), both candidates are pandering to their heritage, and accusations of pandering are an unpersuasive form criticism as it is expected from rational voters. Therefore, I do not find his complaint that her pandering is unfair, abusive or even remotely persuasive to vote for him instead.

If you want to pile on a rhetorical argument that he is racist and shouldn’t be voted for you’d be preaching to the choir, but as you can see accusing your arguer of being racist is both irrelevant and counter-productive to coming to the same conclusion in the end.

source
Sort:hotnewtop