Comment on Rip
SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 months agoRaw milk that is carefully and intentionally produced for direct human consumption is a low-risk food with superb nutritional benefits.
Comment on Rip
SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 months agoRaw milk that is carefully and intentionally produced for direct human consumption is a low-risk food with superb nutritional benefits.
DV8@lemmy.world 3 months ago
While it’s tastier raw, though that’s subjective I suppose, no nutrients are lost during pasteurization. Most minerals aren’t destroyed by that heat. Bacteria and most viri are destroyed however.
The vitamins lost by pasteurization aren’t that significant that it compares to the chance of contracting salmonella.
Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Can you even destroy minerals by heat? If there’s an element there it won’t go away. Though I guess the molecule could change and it could be less bioavailable.
SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Why am I being downvoted for stating something and providing a link to back up what I wrote? It’s not like I posted a bad link. In the previous link, it described how pre-pasteurized milk is categorically different from raw milk intended for direct human consumption. I think it’s interesting to note how preparation for pasteurization can affect the product.
Also this link shows that there are indeed many nutritional benefits not available from pasteurized milk.
DV8@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I suspect you’re downvoted for stating false information. Even now it seems your supposed evidence is literally from suspicious (to say the least) source.
People following your advice expose themselves and their children to harm if follow your advice. Complaining about a downvote seems rather silly in that context.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890836/ I’ll quote from this link: