That’s probably their argument. They probably thought that by removing the water option, people won’t be able to sneak soda and pretend they were getting free water.
Comment on [deleted]
reddig33@lemmy.world 3 months ago
You have to wonder what idiot thought this was a good idea. It just means people will grab a soda and not pay for it.
NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 3 months ago
ZeroTwo@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Really sucks for us non soda drinkers. Maybe they think “if we remove the free water, people will spend money on a soda.” Nah. Not me.
NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 3 months ago
Yeah it’s not a good solution at all. Would have been better to have a separate place for water to serve both purposes. I see a lot of places that will have a glass pitcher dispenser on the side of a soda dispenser just for water.
The water usually tastes better from these, anyway. Not polluted by the sugary soda/carbonation that comes from the same dispenser.
Would also be obvious that someone isn’t getting free soda and pretending to get water since it’s a totally different place.
Donjuanme@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Or it broke?