Comment on Is it me or is everyone in hexbear insane?
TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 3 months agoThey were banned while saying John Brown did nothing wrong and that slaveowners deserve to die.
Sounds pretty cool to me.
Comment on Is it me or is everyone in hexbear insane?
TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 3 months agoThey were banned while saying John Brown did nothing wrong and that slaveowners deserve to die.
Sounds pretty cool to me.
Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
While true there was a lot more behind the decision than that final post. They had been fighting with the admins for a long time.
TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
There actually isn’t any such logic presented for the decision. Mostly just allusions to celebrating violence, the only examples of which were the anti-slavery posts I referenced.
Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Maybe because you didn’t observe it happening. Reddit admins were busy as hell cleaning the place up. All kinds of rightwing subs like some of the incel gathering spots. Some for straight up Nazis like frenworld or whatever it was where they were using honk honk as code for heil Hitler. When the admins made site changes due to complaints about right wing subs, Chapo made the list because they engaged in similar activities with the main complaint being brigading other subs. Their mods refused to change to meet the new rules. The admins eventually removed some of the mods. They still refused to change afterward. Which eventually got them shut down.
TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
I did, actually. I made some of the John Brown posts lol.
Brigading is not an activity similar to supporting incels or Nazis.
I remember the subreddit mods sharing their attempts to communicate with admins on this, offering to make whatever changes would be needed, and getting stonewalled. The subreddit itself adopted a no-brigading policy and included it with an pinned automod comment on every post.
But this is neither here nor there because the ban announcement said nothing about brigading. Instead, they said it was about content violating their new anti-hate policy and a vague statement about mods not “reining” in users. Prior communications and the timeline suggested the only content violations were anti-slavery posts.
How so?
Which ones and why?
Such as?
The reality is that most of this was actually opaque.
TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
evidence? I see people say this but from what I remember the mod team was repeatedly stonewalled by the admins, or at least that was their claims, and I don’t think the admins ever disputed that
Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Hardly, the mods kept refusing to do anything about the brigading of other subs. To the point the admins stepped in and removed a couple of them. Then afterward the sub decided they’d rather go private than comply. At this point most of back and forth is wiped out because the sub is locked. But there was far more going on for a while than their claim that one post shut them down immediately. They had already been in trouble for a couple months.
reddit.com/…/chapotraphouse_gets_a_call_from_the_…
www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%…
TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
I wasn’t clear enough, what I meant wasn’t that the admins literally never said anything to the mods, I meant they made it relatively unclear what exactly they needed to do to stop getting warnings and eventually getting banned. no conversation, just relatively vague commands from down high also, as you can see in the SRD thread it was never made clear if they were removed for anything besides the john brown posting. However, even this is more clear communication than I remembered so I’ll admit fault on that at least.
funny thing though is this comment about why chapo got banned, which mentions brigading, something people constantly accused/accuse hexbear users of doing:
sounds familiar doesn’t it?