Comment on i will never understand scientific fraud
msage@programming.dev 1 week agoSimple - does anything threaten the housing and food? If yes, can NATO stop it? If yes, then yay NATO. Any other case? No thank you.
Demilitarizing the world won’t happen in a night, but we all know NATO won’t agree to it, so it will have to go eventually.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I would argue belligerent nations waging war on agricultural nations, for example Ukraine, is a threat to food and housing.
msage@programming.dev 1 week ago
Well there we go!
In ideal world, things like that would not be necessary, but as we know, asking countries to destroy their weapons never leads to their prosperity… so fuck that, too.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I didn’t ask about Ideal world NATO, I asked about NATO which implies the context of reality we currently live in.
msage@programming.dev 1 week ago
Did I not answer that question in my first comment? Wait - I did.
I then tried to hint that (as my first comment actually started), we as species should try to build a better world, focusing on providing the minimum for everyone before giving very few everything there is.
Is NATO perfect? No, it sucks, but we currently won’t do any better. Like nothing I keep repeating all over here.
But I wish we stopped everything, and I mean everything apart from housing and basic food, to actually solve the climate crisis.
And, ironic as it is, stopping everything would actually be the best thing right now.