I appreciate it <3
Comment on AI Artefacting
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 month agoI was just making a clever reference
SirSamuel@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Comment on AI Artefacting
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 month agoI was just making a clever reference
I appreciate it <3
areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 month ago
The problem is that some people like me won’t get that reference and instead think AIs are universally bad. A lot of people already think this way, and it’s hard to know who believes what.
leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 1 month ago
The problem is that people selling LLMs keep calling them AI, and people keep buying their bullshit.
AI isn’t necessarily bad. LLMs are.
areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 month ago
LLMs have legitimate uses today even if they are currently somewhat limited. In the future they will have more legitimate and illegitimate uses. The capabilities of current LLMs are often oversold though, which leads to a lot of this resentment.
leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 1 month ago
No they don’t. The only thing they can be somewhat reliable for is autocomplete, and the slight improvement in quality doesn’t compensate the massive increase in costs.
No. Thanks to LLM peddlers being excessively greedy and saturating the internet with LLM generated garbage newly trained models will be poisoned and only get worse with every iteration.
LLMs have only one capability: to produce the most statistically likely token after a given chain of tokens, according to their model.
Future LLMs will still only have this capability, but since their models will have been trained on LLM generated garbage their results will quickly diverge from anything even remotely intelligible.
SirSamuel@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Clearly, based on your responses, you don’t think AI/LLMs are universally bad. And anyone who is that easily swayed by what is essentially a clever shitpost likely also thinks the earth is flat and birds aren’t real.
You know. Morons.