Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone
archomrade@midwest.social 2 months agoThe paper wasn’t discussing food stamp programs or even what food you might already have
Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone
archomrade@midwest.social 2 months agoThe paper wasn’t discussing food stamp programs or even what food you might already have
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
right. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper
archomrade@midwest.social 2 months ago
What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.”
Which is factually supported by the study, even if you’d prefer to interpret it to mean something else
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
…for a limited segment of the population.
archomrade@midwest.social 2 months ago
It’s actually not speaking the personal costs born by consumers, it’s talking about the cost of purchasing food for the diet.
As I said, if the paper was discussing the systemic hurtles and personal choices of consumers it would be a different paper, saying a different thing.