Comment on [deleted]
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 9 months ago
“Just”? Tit for tat is not “just”, revenge is not “just”. Truth and consequences are just. If he actually didn’t win the election and it was truly fraud and cheating that got him the win, then yes, it would be just to bring that truth to light and execute the consequences of that truth. If he won fair and square, pretending like he didn’t is not just simply because he did it before.
SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Perhaps, but with all of the voter suppression and election rigging that has been done by the Republicans, can you really say he won “fair and square” at this point?
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 9 months ago
If it’s by a hairs breadth, no. Depends on the specifics
SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 9 months ago
So if a cheater wins hard enough, it can be called “fair and square”? Not sure what specifics could get me on board with that.
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Again, depends on the specifics. The dude tries to cheat all the time and he should be locked up. That doesn’t mean that the majority won’t still vote for him, as fucking insane as that is