Comment

Comment on FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR3) - AMD Stage Presentation | gamescom 2023

I don’t think so, there’s nothing I can see that suggests that. The only real differences are likely to be to do with lag. There’s nothing suggesting a quality difference between if a game has it built in vs you forcing it on a game.

source

Sort:hotnew top

simple@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
EuroGamer confirmed it

The principles are similar to DLSS 3, but the execution is obviously different as unlike the Nvidia solution, there are no AI or bespoke hardware components in the mix. A combination of motion vector input from FSR 2 and optical flow analysis is used.

AMD wanted us to show us something new and very interesting. Prefaced with the caveat that there will be obvious image quality issues in some scenarios, we saw an early demo of AMD Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF), which is a driver-level frame generation option for all DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 titles. […] This is using optical flow only. No motion vector input from FSR 2 means that the best AFMF can do is interpolate a new frame between two standard rendered frames similar to the way a TV does it - albeit with far less latency. The generated frames will be ‘coarser’ without the motion vector data

source
NewNewAccount@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Then why would any developer ever build it into a game?

source
- echo64@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  It’s part of their suite of tools, that includes other things like lag reduction tech. In addition, if your game isn’t dx11 or dx12 then you can still provide it to the user. The generic version only works with dx11/12
  
  source