Comment

Comment on FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR3) - AMD Stage Presentation | gamescom 2023

NewNewAccount@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

Looks like there are two versions. One is the one built into the game itself, far more advanced than what your tv can do. The other, supporting all dx11 and dx12 games, is like the soap opera effect from your tv.

source

Sort:hotnew top

echo64@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I don’t think so, there’s nothing I can see that suggests that. The only real differences are likely to be to do with lag. There’s nothing suggesting a quality difference between if a game has it built in vs you forcing it on a game.

source
- simple@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  EuroGamer confirmed it
  
  The principles are similar to DLSS 3, but the execution is obviously different as unlike the Nvidia solution, there are no AI or bespoke hardware components in the mix. A combination of motion vector input from FSR 2 and optical flow analysis is used.
  
  AMD wanted us to show us something new and very interesting. Prefaced with the caveat that there will be obvious image quality issues in some scenarios, we saw an early demo of AMD Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF), which is a driver-level frame generation option for all DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 titles. […] This is using optical flow only. No motion vector input from FSR 2 means that the best AFMF can do is interpolate a new frame between two standard rendered frames similar to the way a TV does it - albeit with far less latency. The generated frames will be ‘coarser’ without the motion vector data
  
  source
- NewNewAccount@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Then why would any developer ever build it into a game?
  
  source
  - echo64@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    It’s part of their suite of tools, that includes other things like lag reduction tech. In addition, if your game isn’t dx11 or dx12 then you can still provide it to the user. The generic version only works with dx11/12
    
    source