Comment on No one really understands our struggle
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 year agoLol heaven forbid that someone should want you to have an understanding of what you’re talking about.
Comment on No one really understands our struggle
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 year agoLol heaven forbid that someone should want you to have an understanding of what you’re talking about.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
If you can’t simplify it enough to summarize in less than 57 000 words, then you don’t understand it.
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Also, some topics take a lot of nuance time to explain properly. Unless you think the concept of “books” is stupid for some reason, which I’m starting to suspect that you do.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
If someone is trying to convince you that vaccines are bad and their only argument is “read this book and you’ll see what I’m talking about” are you going to read the book? No.
Other anti-vaxxers replying with “I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted, that’s what the book says!” Does not contribute to the argument.
You want to convince people something is true you need to present them with an argument, not a book report. If they already think you’re an idiot they’re not going to read your idiot book. When they present counter arguments that is your opportunity to present any nuance you have.
To put another way: it’s not my job to make your argument for you by studying a topic I don’t agree with.
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Nobody is asking you to study the topic, but when the topic is “did Adam Smith like landlords” and you say “no” and then refuse to read what he actually said about it or listen to people who actually have read it then you look like an idiot. Like sorry bud, that’s how it is.
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The argument was that Adam Smith hated landlords, which is incorrect, and he was citing his source you fucking sausage hahaha
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 year ago
He did summarize it though.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
There was no summary. Best was
“Some guy said rent is good” does not summarize why rent is good. At best it’s an appeal to authority.
Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 year ago
He’s not “some guy”, he’s Adam Smith, one of the main political philosophers responsible for what we know now as capitalism. And it’s a common misconception by people that don’t actually read books that he thinks that landlords, as we have them currently, were bad. Which isn’t true. He summarized it for you and then also added the whole “harvesting kelp” part as well, and then suggested if you want to understand more the nuances of how he feels about landlords you can read more about it. And for some reason you’re like “fuck you” hahaha
Like dude, I don’t get what your issue here is. It sounds like you’re just being bitchy for bitches sake.