Comment on Universes

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Really?

  source

  • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The lighting is copyrighted, so it’s technically copyright infringement.

    source

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I’m sorry, fucking what?

      How can lighting, or the sight of something be copyright?

      Fuck what wonderful captialistic hellscape we live in

      source

      • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Architecture is an artistic medium, so it’s subject to copyright. It gets a little complicated though, because this wasn’t legally decided until the latter half of the 20th century.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I’ll start obeying French law when they extradite Roman Polanski

      source

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        He’s not in France, so that’s tricky.

        source
• Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The Eiffel Tower in the meme is as illegal as the Rattaouile frame since if the photo is from a broadcast the royalties have already been dealt with.

  source