Or stop trying to implement price controls and just give poor people welfare
Comment on Opinion: Increasing the minimum wage comes at too high a price for workers | CNN
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 3 months agoPersonally, I think the minimum wage should be abolished and a living wage implemented. The term minimum seems to cause a lot of debate about the idea of the wage or a bargaining system like many of the European states have.
A living wage should be able to pay rent, own a basic car, have health insurance, etc. As such it would be regionally adjusted to guarantee a basic standard of living.
The idea of a national minimum wage is just silly since the cost of living varies so much regionally. It ends up screwing people in areas where the cost is higher.
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months ago
The minimum wage was intended to be a living wage.
The fact that you just tried to make a distinction between the two shows how far we’ve fallen.
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Minimum wage was never intended to be a living wage. In its inception in 1938 minimum wage was $0.25 an hour. Here are things that could be purchased for 25 cents in 1938. A gallon of milk, 8 postage stamps, a matenee movie ticket, 2 gallons of gas, … Rent was half a months wages. Minimum wage was never a living wage.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months ago
It absolutely was, and more.
www.minimum-wage.org/articles/history
As part of the FLSA, the minimum wage was enacted at $0.25/hr to maintain a “minimum standard of living necessary for health, efficiency and general well-being, without substantially curtailing employment”.
Better luck next time, Jimbo.
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 3 months ago
If It was intended to be a living wage then why wasn’t it enough to be a living wage?
I will refer to your own source.
You have to look past the political propaganda and hyperbole. Minimum wage was implemented to get close to a “living wage” without hurting businesses.
It shouldn’t surprise me that you blindly believe politicians.
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 3 months ago
FACTUALLY FALSE
“Franklin Roosevelt’s Statement on the National Industrial Recovery Act,” dated June 16 1933.
docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/odnirast.html
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 3 months ago
That’s all well and good that FDR said his goal was to have everyone have a living wage, but the minimum wage didn’t do that. A full time minimum wage worker in 1940 would have rent consume 50% food 35% which leaves 15% for clothes, medical, hygiene, & utilities. It was barely enough to survive on and many people had to forgo necessities.