Seems like confession through projection to me, considering I have explained a number of actual situations and you have so far explained theoretical legal constructs.
Seems like confession through projection to me, considering I have explained a number of actual situations and you have so far explained theoretical legal constructs.
mayonesa@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Here, sift through this
https://www.mediaite.com/news/whopping-64-percent-of-republicans-say-affirmative-action-unfairly-discriminates-against-white-people-almost-triple-everyone-else/
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna30462129
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40804848
sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 2 years ago
None of this negates the true facts I've said.
The world isn't so polite as to be so cut and dry.
mayonesa@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Check out the movement against it:
https://tennesseelookout.com/2022/02/28/senator-to-propose-elimination-of-affirmative-action-program/
sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 2 years ago
That legislation is not about general labor law, it is about the state's internal hiring practices. If you run a privately owned corner store, you can hire whoever you want within reason. In this case, the state chose to force the state to hire certain people for purely political reasons, and this senator is trying to end that employers discriminatory hiring practices.
Really, the state could say tomorrow it's only hiring white Anglo-Saxon protestant males and it's unlikely labor law per se could stop them since it's the state.