I’m explaining
No, you're spreading wishful thinking as fact.
You’ll see lots of job ads, but that’s because they have to be able to show they tried to find an american worker before hiring an H1B.
They have no legal liability for doing that, which is governed by a different set of laws and not a 14A/1980 case. Disparate impact means their company gets seized if they do not have enough minority faces; that is the reality of affirmative action.
Regulations without teeth, not based in civil rights law AT ALL, say that they must make a token effort to find American workers. Guess what is defined vaguely in the statute.
sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 2 years ago
Seems like confession through projection to me, considering I have explained a number of actual situations and you have so far explained theoretical legal constructs.
mayonesa@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Here, sift through this
https://www.mediaite.com/news/whopping-64-percent-of-republicans-say-affirmative-action-unfairly-discriminates-against-white-people-almost-triple-everyone-else/
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna30462129
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40804848
sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 2 years ago
None of this negates the true facts I've said.
The world isn't so polite as to be so cut and dry.
mayonesa@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Check out the movement against it:
https://tennesseelookout.com/2022/02/28/senator-to-propose-elimination-of-affirmative-action-program/