Using that argument, can’t you shift the needle even more by voting for someone more left than Biden?
Comment on If I live in a red state, would it be better to vote for rfk to take votes away from trump?
sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If you are in a deep red state, it will seem that your vote won’t matter. Because it mostly won’t. However, the way States vote changes over time. The closer the vote totals in a State, the more likely the National Democratic Party is to invest resources into building up and promoting candidates in those States. That sort of thing can shift the needle, if slowly. Keep in mind that California voted Republican from '68 to '88 (source) but shifted over time.
It sucks to vote and feel like you’re just pissing in the wind. But, each vote moves the needle just a bit more and maybe, eventually, things will swing.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No, because your vote won’t encourage investment in flipping the State. I agree that the current duopoly sucks. I was an ardent Bernie supporter and would very much like viable third parties. But, the DNC isn’t going to be looking at those third party votes. They need to believe that the Democrats have a chance of winning before they will invest in a State. If all they see are protest votes, then they won’t see a viable path to them winning and they will continue to ignore the State.
Ya, it sucks, but we really do need to just keep holding our nose and pulling the lever for the Democrat in the general election.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Disagree. If many vote for an extreme eco warrior independent candidate then both parties will shift their policies to appeal to those voters.
Americans don’t need to vote for winners for their vote to count.
TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 1 month ago
“Pissing in the wind” is such a great phrase