And he still didnt answer. His response, to immediately bring up that “hacking” is a federal crime, implied that he is in trouble, but then what he said after changed it to “well, he WOULD be in trouble, but if you do XYZ, maybe we can change that.” Thats a threat, plain and simple.
Comment on Former Bungie, Pokémon Lawyer Explains How They Caught Leakers
Donut@leminal.space 3 months agoThe parent literally asked whether their kid was in trouble. Wouldn’t it be disingenuous to not answer truthfully (at the caveat that it was actually the truth)?
I saw it more as a way to resolve it peacefully without getting to the stuff nobody likes
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Bezier@suppo.fi 3 months ago
Well there’s the problem. Doesn’t seem that the kid did anything illegal, so the federal crime implication was a very disingenuous scare tactic.