Comment

Comment on The amount of sugar consumed by children from soft drinks in the UK halved within a year of the sugar tax being introduced, a study has found.

<- View Parent

Not_mikey@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Where are you getting that they’re potentially worse? They may have some adverse effects but they seem minor compared to sugar. For aspartame there seems to be some studies possibly linking it with cancer, but those are very limited and even after those studies came out the WHO reaffirmed it’s safety at normal levels. Meanwhile actual sugar has been proven to cause diabetes, heart disease, obesity etc. Sucralose doesn’t seem to show any adverse effects at normal doses.

A lot of the controversy on artificial sweeteners comes from the sugar lobby combined with moral panics and conspiracies on using “chemicals” in foods.

source

Sort:hotnew top

RobotToaster@mander.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
The WHO advises not to use them who.int/…/15-05-2023-who-advises-not-to-use-non-s…

Personally I don’t agree with their reasoning, but given the controversy I don’t feel comfortable forcing them on people.

source
- vaionko@sopuli.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  They advise not to use them for weight control. That’s a bit different than what you’re implying.
  
  source
fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I did say “controversially” and “potentially” :)

I think it was the WHO who mentioned it last year, but it keeps cropping up each year from various university studies - of course I’ll have only ever read the news reports of those studies.

I absolutely agree though, I’d be highly suspicious of sugar company (or high-fructose-syrup) lobbying.

Personally my preference is for “things to just be less sweet” (like why does some bread or soup have sugar in now?!?), though I suspect it’s a bit of a minority opinion :)

source
guy_threepwood@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I refuse to have anything with Stevia in it as it gives me the shits. And Aspartame tastes weird.

I do have less sugar as a result, though!

source