This is why, in retrospective, I’ve really fallen out of love with Pokémon. I could have spent that time learning about real-world animals and plants, since it’s so arguable, whether Pokémon are even cooler to begin with.
Comment on It's been so long
RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 5 months agoHonestly I don’t even think gen 1 Pokémon are anymore creative than the others. I was still a kid when the concept was new so they felt fresh, but pretty much every Pokémon I can think of is based on an existing archetype of some sort. Plant/Animal, inanimate object brought to life, spirits, dinosaurs, etc. Then you sprinkle on some regional flavor and there you go, you got a Pokémon.
“Identity” isn’t something that belongs to the object, it’s something that is assigned to the object by an observer.
Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 months ago
RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I still love Pokémon, I just try not to let my nostalgia for the old games get in the way of enjoying the new ones. I try to judge everything on its own merit.
But yeah I agree, really animals are way more complex and interesting than anything you’d find in a game.
Mango@lemmy.world 5 months ago
If you can’t see it, you can’t see it. I can’t point it out to you.
RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Very true!
BakerBagel@midwest.social 5 months ago
The grass Joto starter was literally named after looking in the spice cabinet.
RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Magnemite is named after a magnet and Voltorb is an electric orb.
Tauros and Porygon are just one letter away from Taurus and polygon.
Ekans is snake backwards.
I’m open to having my mind changed, but I’m going to need more lol