Sex segregated spaces are allowed thogh?, is it just art spaces that aren’t.
Women’s only gyms, women’s only swimming pools.etc
Some guy who lived near a ladies only pool in Sydney sued becase he wanted to use it but he lost.
Comment on Picasso artworks put in female toilet as part of art gallery response to court ruling
MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
“Ms Kaechele described the Ladies Lounge as a response to the lived experience of women forbidden from entering certain spaces throughout history,” Mr Grueber said.
Fortunately, modern legislation prohibits sex-segregated art displays, so the practices Ms Kaechele is responding to are no longer legal in Australia.
If Ms Kaechele would like to campaign for a return to sex-segregated art displays, I am certain she would be displeased by the outcome of abolishing sex discrimination laws.
hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
That’s a shame. Between all the men’s only spaces and the women’s only spaces, nonbinary people lose.
Kayel@aussie.zone 1 week ago
That’s the point of the court ruling right? It recognises the current climate when determining safety and disadvantage, not the past.
MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
You know, in Australia, there’s men’s only homeless shelters and women’s only homeless shelters, but no nonbinary only homeless shelters. And of the mixed gender homeless shelters, very few of them have a designated space for nonbinary people or people of all genders. If you’re nonbinary and homeless, chances are you either live on the street, or in a men’s section or a women’s section. Now, given the issues nonbinary youth tend to suffer with transphobic parents, I daresay nonbinary people are one of the groups most in need of homeless shelters. Some homeless shelters have a mixed gender space, and that’s the right way to do it. This is more common with shelters that house families as well as individuals.
You know, recent studies show that nonbinary people are more common than both trans men and trans women. As societal gender issues literacy increases, the number of nonbinary people just goes up and up, and it’s showing no sign of slowing down. Given that there are a billion nonbinary genders and only two binary genders, I wouldn’t be surprised if the current gender revolution ends up with most people nonbinary. Nobody fits the ideals of masculinity or femininity perfectly, and there’s more and more young people opting out of the binary entirely, even if they’re the kind of people who could have gone their whole lives being happy with their assigned gender in the old world.
Kayel@aussie.zone 1 week ago
That’s the point of the court ruling right? It recognises the current climate when determining safety and disadvantage, not the past.
TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 week ago
No she thinks it’s fair for women to discriminate against men, “for at least 300 years”.
Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Unfortunately this is what a lot of people who claim to be advocates of equality want. They don’t want actual equality, they want harmful inequality for the group that used to benefit from it. That doesn’t provide justice for anyone, it just perpetuates injustice, especially since many people who never actually benefitted from the previous inequality will be harmed by the reversed situation. We need true inclusivity, not this role reversal bullshit that so many popular ideologies espouse.
grue@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Get some reading comprehension skills. Pushing back on pearl-clutchers claiming it’s “counterproductive” when they’re really just butthurt about it isn’t at all the same thing as “want[ing] harmful inequality.”
Point out where I actually endorsed the tactic – hint: you won’t be able to – or retract your false statement.
Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 week ago
No thanks. I have no interest in engaging in your little debate games. Good day.